The argument that morality provides evidence for the existence of God is based on the premise that objective moral values—real, unchanging standards of right and wrong—actually exist. According to the source, this evidence is structured through a logical moral argument:
- If objective moral values exist, then God exists.
- Objective moral values (such as good and evil, justice and injustice) do exist.
- Therefore, God exists.
The source elaborates on this evidence through several key points:
The Existence of Objective Morality
The source argues that most rational people recognize that certain actions are not just “felt” to be wrong but are inherently evil, regardless of personal opinion or cultural traditions. Examples include:
- Universal Recognition: Most people recognize that cutting in line is unfair, and actions like torturing an innocent child for fun or the mass murders committed by Nazi Germany are viewed as objectively wicked.
- Universal Praise: Virtues like courage are praised across different times and cultures.
The Need for an Objective Standard
For something to be truly “wrong,” the source asserts there must be an objective point of reference or a “higher law” that exists outside of human opinion. If morality were merely situational or defined by a nation, it would be relative, meaning an action could be considered “good” one day and “evil” the next. The source concludes that since we know certain things are absolutely right or wrong, there must be an unchanging standard, which points to a Moral Lawgiver—God.
The Limitations of Atheistic Evolution
The source contends that atheism cannot logically explain morality. It offers the following reasons:
- Matter in Motion: If humans are merely “matter in motion” evolved from rocks and slime, there is no basis for moral judgment.
- Animal Comparison: Animals are not held to moral standards—one does not call a dog “depraved” for stealing a bone or a killer whale “guilty” of murder. If humans are just evolved animals, then real objective right and wrong should not exist.
- The Dilemma: The source states that atheists must either admit objective morality exists (which implies a God) or argue that everything is relative, which would mean that even horrific acts like child abuse could not be condemned as truly, objectively evil.
In summary, the source concludes that the very fact that humans think about morality and recognize universal rules against stealing, murdering, or lying is evidence that we are not the products of chance, but were created by a good God who established these rules.